Unit 7- Progressivism & Imperialism

Yawp Chapters 18, 19 & 20

Chapter 18: Life in Industrial America

When British author Rudyard Kipling visited Chicago in 1889, he described a city captivated by technology and blinded by greed. He described a rushed and crowded city, a “huge wilderness” with “scores of miles of these terrible streets” and their “hundred thousand of these terrible people.” “The show impressed me with a great horror,” he wrote. “There was no color in the street and no beauty—only a maze of wire ropes overhead and dirty stone flagging under foot.” He took a cab “and the cabman said that these things were the proof of progress.” Kipling visited a “gilded and mirrored” hotel “crammed with people talking about money, and spitting about everywhere.” He visited extravagant churches and spoke with their congregants. “I listened to people who said that the mere fact of spiking down strips of iron to wood, and getting a steam and iron thing to run along them was progress, that the telephone was progress, and the net-work of wires overhead was progress. They repeated their statements again and again.” Kipling said American newspapers report “that the snarling together of telegraph-wires, the heaving up of houses, and the making of money is progress.”1

Chicago embodied the triumph of American industrialization. Its meatpacking industry typified the sweeping changes occurring in American life. The last decades of the nineteenth century, a new era for big business, saw the formation of large corporations, run by trained bureaucrats and salaried managers, doing national and international business. Chicago, for instance, became America’s butcher. The Chicago meat processing industry, a cartel of five firms, produced four-fifths of the meat bought by American consumers. Kipling described in intimate detail the Union Stock Yards, the nation’s largest meat processing zone, a square-mile just southwest of the city whose pens and slaughterhouses linked the city’s vast agricultural hinterland to the nation’s dinner tables. “Once having seen them,” he concluded, “you will never forget the sight.” Like other notable Chicago industries, such as agricultural machinery and steel production, the meatpacking industry was closely tied to urbanization and immigration. In 1850, Chicago had a population of about 30,000. Twenty years later, it had 300,000. Nothing could stop the city’s growth. The Great Chicago Fire leveled 3.5 square miles and left a third of its residents homeless in 1871, but the city quickly recovered and resumed its spectacular growth. By the turn of the twentieth century, the city was home to 1.7 million people. Read the rest of Chapter 18 from the American Yawp.

Questions to be thinking about as you move through the content of this chapter

  1. How did mass transportation affect cities?  How did it affect industrialization?
  2. What factors led to urban in-migration from the countryside?
  3. Why did immigrants leave their countries and come to America?
  4. Describe the relationship between inner cities and poverty.  What types of housing problems did cities face?  Did reform efforts help?
  5. Discuss the emergence of the Jim Crow Laws in the American South.
  6. How did technology reshape the American economy?  Be sure that you can offer specific examples.
  7. Describe the role played by political machines, such as Tammany Hall in New York, in the new cities of the Gilded Age.
  8. How did the south attempt to redefine the meaning of the Civil War after Reconstruction?  Was it successful?  Why or why not?
  9. How did the economic and social changes of the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries challenge traditional gender norms?
  10. Why was the development of the leisure and entertainment industries so important for urban life?  What impact did they have on urban dwellers?

Chapter 19: American Empire

The word “Empire” might conjure images of ancient Rome, the Persian Empire, or the British Empire—powers that depended variously upon military conquest, colonization, occupation, or direct resource exploitation—but empires can take many forms and imperial processes can occur in many contexts. 100 years after the United States won its independence from the British Empire, had it become an empire of its own?

In the decades after the American Civil War, the United States exerted itself in the service of American interests around the world. In the Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East, and most explicitly in the Spanish-American War and under the foreign policy of Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft, the United States expanded upon a long history of exploration, trade, and cultural exchange to practice something that looked remarkably like empire. The question of American imperialism, then, seeks to understand not only direct American interventions in such places as Cuba, the Philippines, Hawaii, Guam, and Puerto Rico, but also the deeper history of American engagement with the wider world and the subsequent ways in which American economic, political, and cultural power has shaped the actions, choices, and possibilities of other groups and nations.

Meanwhile, as the United States asserted itself abroad, it received ever more numbers of foreign peoples at home. European and Asian immigrants poured into the United States. In a sense, imperialism and immigration raised similar questions about American identity: who was an “American,” and who wasn’t? What were the nation’s obligations to foreign powers and foreign peoples? And how accessible—and how fluid—should American identity be for newcomers? All such questions confronted late-nineteenth-century Americans with unprecedented urgency. Read more from Chapter 19 of the American Yawp.

Questions to be thinking about as you move through the content of this chapter

  1. What were the primary reasons for American intervention in foreign affairs in the late-19th and early-20th century?
  2. How did yellow journalism contribute to outbreak of the Spanish-American War?
  3. Why was the Spanish-American War referred to as a “splendid little war?”  Is that description fitting?
  4. How did the United States gain control of the Philippines?
  5. Be sure that you can discuss and analyze the debates over American imperialism within the United States.  What were some of the justifications for expansion?  What were the arguments against?
  6. What was the Roosevelt Corollary and how did it change American foreign policy?
  7. What is meant by the phrase “dollar diplomacy,” and how did it pertain to US interventions in Latin America?
  8. How was imperialism a “gendered” concept?
  9. What issues existed concerning immigration in the US in the late-19th and early-20th centuries?  Be sure to consider the factors behind immigration, questions of assimilation, and political responses in your answer.
  10. What kinds of immigrants were most likely to be “excluded” from entry into the United States?  Why?

Chapter 20: The Progressive Era

“Never in the history of the world was society in so terrific flux as it is right now,” Jack London wrote in Iron Heel, his 1908 dystopian novel in which a corporate oligarchy comes to rule the United States. He wrote, “The swift changes in our industrial system are causing equally swift changes in our religious, political, and social structures. An unseen and fearful revolution is taking place in the fiber and structure of society. One can only dimly feel these things, but they are in the air, now, today.”1

The many problems associated with the Gilded Age—the rise of unprecedented fortunes and unprecedented poverty, controversies over imperialism, urban squalor, a near-war between capital and labor, loosening social mores, unsanitary food production, the onrush of foreign immigration, environmental destruction, and the outbreak of political radicalism—confronted Americans. Terrible forces seemed out of control and the nation seemed imperiled. Farmers and workers had been waging political war against capitalists and political conservatives for decades, but then, slowly, toward the end of the nineteenth century a new generation of middle class Americans interjected themselves into public life and advocated new reforms to tame the runaway world of the Gilded Age.

Widespread dissatisfaction with new trends in American society spurred the Progressive Era, named for the various “progressive” movements that attracted various constituencies around various reforms. Americans had many different ideas about how the country’s development should be managed and whose interests required the greatest protection. Reformers sought to clean up politics, black Americans continued their long struggle for civil rights, women demanded the vote with greater intensity while also demanding a more equal role in society at large, and workers demanded higher wages, safer workplaces and the union recognition that would guarantee these rights. Whatever their goals, “reform” became the word of the age, and the sum of their efforts, whatever their ultimate impact or original intentions, gave the era its name. Read more from Chapter 20 of the American Yawp.


Questions to be thinking about as you move through the content of this chapter

  1. What were the differences between the upper-class, working-class, and socialist reformers during the Progressive Era? 
  2. How did legislation help reformers advance their causes?
  3. How effective was “moral legislation” in the late nineteenth century?  Did this approach cause any problems?
  4. In what ways did women participate in politics in the Progressive Era?  How did this ultimately lead to women’s suffrage and the Nineteenth Amendment?
  5. How did muckrakers contribute to the Progressive Era?
  6. What is meant by the term “trust busting?” 
  7. Describe the progressive reforms of the Roosevelt and Wilson administrations.  How did Taft’s administration differ from these two?
  8. Compare and contrast the two primary approaches to progressive environmentalism: preservation & conservation.
  9. Compare and contrast Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Dubois in terms of their approaches to Civil Rights.